Jump to content

Bodysurf

Members
  • Posts

    833
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Posts posted by Bodysurf

  1. 3 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    Quality over Quantity FOREVER!!! 

    PS... IMG won a Natty in 2020 with a record of 8-0. 

    In Cali the 2020 season was played in the Spring of 2021. MD finished ranked #1 by Massey and Calpreps for what was actually considered the 2020 season. 
    But we would never claim to have won anything in 2020. IMO if you don’t have playoffs, you can’t claim anything.

  2. 9 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    And according to every metric out there, IMG played a tougher schedule than BG. CalPreps, Comp Roll, etc. Pick your poison. 

    They are comparable. But as mentioned, BG’s SOS is scewed downward because they are forced to play some truly terrible Nevada teams. If you compare only the top 4-5 teams that BG and IMG played, BG had the better schedule.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    If that's the case why should MD schedule BG, or SJB schedule STA, or IMG schedule SJP or SFA? "Backing-in" to a MNC will never be acceptable in our rankings. Remember, BG bailed on MD to play LBP! Let the other eight (8) polls sell their souls. #playthebest #anyoneanywhere #nocowardsallowed 

    The most satisfying OOS game for me has been against Duncanville…… A public school.  
    MD should schedule games against BG and STA simply because they are good. It’s irrelevant they are private. We should aspire to play the best teams in the country period, not the best private school teams in the country.

    • Thanks 1
  4. 1 minute ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    As a fan of a power private that #playsthebest #anytimeanywhere, how can you not hold BG accountable for scheduling ALL publics in 2023? 

    If SFA went 12-0 this season beating all public slappies from the state MD, would you feel the same way? There's no way you would. 

    It doesn’t matter whether a team is public or private. All I care about is how good they are. Is Cen10 bad because they are public? Are Texas’ best bad because they are public? I don’t take into consideration public versus private when assessing a team’s quality. Granted, the majority of top teams are private. But they are not top teams because they are private.

    BG played good teams before they got into their league schedule. Who cares if those teams were public. I don’t hold that against them. Would it have better if Gorman played a private that was ranked lower than Cen10 or Corner Canyon? You make it sound like it would be.

    • Like 1
  5. 4 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    The fact that BG has all wins vs public schools is a joke. How does that equate to a MNC when every other power private did the opposite? Why would you allow BG to "back-in" to a MNC that isn't earned?

    Plus check out @misterfootball Top 50 Composite Rankings. SJP is ranked higher than any other team that BG beat. It's fairly simple to understand to those who are unbiased. 

    If I was biased I would say MD deserves to be the MNC. They don’t because they shit the bed on Oct 13th. BG deserves it. I’m being as objective as possible.

    • Like 2
  6. 59 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

     And IMG had a better schedule than BG. 

    I wouldn’t say that. According to your own subjective poll that may be the case based on the ranking of SJP. They had basically the same overall SOS. But Gorman had 2 better OOS wins compared to IMG. Gorman has no control over the fact that Nevada teams overall suck. 

    • Like 1
  7. 2 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    And that's where they belong. Again, very rarely will a team with a loss be crowned our MNC. Our criteria has been transparent to all from Day One, including last season. 

    It is transparent and you say SOS and OOS marque wins are most important. So by your own criteria, MD and Gorman are ahead of IMG who has an absolutely embarrassing schedule for a team of their caliber. 

    • Haha 1
  8. 2 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    You and I both know that the homer refs gifted that game to MD in the Q4. Watch it again. You and I also both know that it's cowardly to schedule and team and then blackball them after one game. SJB, MD and BG should all be playing IMG annually as evidenced by the national rankings each and every season. 

    So the refs gifted MD the game? Come on!
    Why do you keep placing blame on teams for decision of the CIF to not allow teams to play IMG? CIF made that rule probably because MD scheduled the game. It was enacted almost immediately after it was scheduled, and actually before being played. Fortunately they were still able to play.

    I’m glad we got the chance to play IMG but I would prefer MD to play real high schools. Next year hopefully we play Gorman and STA. There is not much appetite among team supporters to play academies. Maybe you can schedule us to play St Joseph’s Prep. 

    • Like 1
  9. 7 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

    ??? how so

    IMG beat # 6 SJP while BG beat #10 Cen10

    6>10

    T25 112023.jpg

    I don’t give credibility to a poll that has St Joesph #6. I was going by computer polls that have Both Cen10 and Corner Canyon higher than IMGs best opponent which was Ben Davis.

    I also use my eyes to judge teams. IMG has a team filled with future college players, yet they play these simple schemes and have the precision of a Pop Warner team.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  10. 3 hours ago, Sammy Swordsman said:

    10 game schedule

    8 of 10 games were vs. non Top 100 teams

    0 playoffs

    Did not play any elites in their own state

    No top 10 National wins.

    3 point win over SJP (SJP has 0 top 100 wins).

    Best win is vs a Minor State (Indiana) team which has no Top 50 wins, and only beat 2 Top 100 teams by 3 points each

    eeked out a 3 point win over SFA which lost to SJB by 23 points and Mater Dei by 13 points.

     

    💯 Preach

×
×
  • Create New...