Sammy Swordsman Posted November 27, 2023 Share Posted November 27, 2023 Based on your own criteria and using results through 11/18 (which were used for your most recent poll), SJP had no legs to be ranked #6 other than to Prop up IMG SOS. Let peel back that onion. Below is a list of teams you ranked lower than SJP (11-1 best win #104). Based on your own criteria their is justification for these teams to have been ranked higher than SJP but were not. The only explanation is that SJP needs to be #6 to justify IMG's Natty. #7 - STA (11-1) but has a better win #34 Cocoa #9 - Colquitt (12-0) Undefeated #11 - Desoto (11-0) Undefeated #12 Northshore (11-0) Undefeated #13 Mill Creek (12-0) Undefeated #14 Norland (12-0) Undefeated #16 Duncanville (10-1) Wins over #86 and #96 #18 Corner Canyon (12-1) Wins over #21 and #78 SJP also has ZERO Top 100 OOS wins. Playing a non top 100 OOS does not count for anything* SJP is an empty suit and only function is to be a vessel for IMG Natty. *texas OOS wins vs. La teams and lower level Fla teams are also meaningless. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Testadura Posted November 27, 2023 Share Posted November 27, 2023 4 hours ago, Sammy Swordsman said: Based on your own criteria and using results through 11/18 (which were used for your most recent poll), SJP had no legs to be ranked #6 other than to Prop up IMG SOS. Let peel back that onion. Below is a list of teams you ranked lower than SJP (11-1 best win #104). Based on your own criteria their is justification for these teams to have been ranked higher than SJP but were not. The only explanation is that SJP needs to be #6 to justify IMG's Natty. #7 - STA (11-1) but has a better win #34 Cocoa #9 - Colquitt (12-0) Undefeated #11 - Desoto (11-0) Undefeated #12 Northshore (11-0) Undefeated #13 Mill Creek (12-0) Undefeated #14 Norland (12-0) Undefeated #16 Duncanville (10-1) Wins over #86 and #96 #18 Corner Canyon (12-1) Wins over #21 and #78 SJP also has ZERO Top 100 OOS wins. Playing a non top 100 OOS does not count for anything* SJP is an empty suit and only function is to be a vessel for IMG Natty. *texas OOS wins vs. La teams and lower level Fla teams are also meaningless. Who squealed? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GardenStateBaller Posted November 27, 2023 Share Posted November 27, 2023 13 hours ago, Sammy Swordsman said: Based on your own criteria and using results through 11/18 (which were used for your most recent poll), SJP had no legs to be ranked #6 other than to Prop up IMG SOS. Let peel back that onion. Below is a list of teams you ranked lower than SJP (11-1 best win #104). Based on your own criteria their is justification for these teams to have been ranked higher than SJP but were not. The only explanation is that SJP needs to be #6 to justify IMG's Natty. #7 - STA (11-1) but has a better win #34 Cocoa #9 - Colquitt (12-0) Undefeated #11 - Desoto (11-0) Undefeated #12 Northshore (11-0) Undefeated #13 Mill Creek (12-0) Undefeated #14 Norland (12-0) Undefeated #16 Duncanville (10-1) Wins over #86 and #96 #18 Corner Canyon (12-1) Wins over #21 and #78 SJP also has ZERO Top 100 OOS wins. Playing a non top 100 OOS does not count for anything* SJP is an empty suit and only function is to be a vessel for IMG Natty. *texas OOS wins vs. La teams and lower level Fla teams are also meaningless. SJP started at #9 in our preseason poll. Their only loss was to #1 IMG (17-14) over Labor Day weekend. EVERY human pollster has SJP ranked from 6-10 in the composite poll. We all can't be wrong. @misterfootball Top 50 Composite Rankings doesn't lie!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.