Except the mass majority above have shown that they are not perfect and that includes all the major recruited up Privates.
Do I need to go through the list for you?
The strength of schedule is BS is in the first place. Have you really examined MD schedule based on real time facts? You make way too many assumptions based on your opinion of these teams coming into the season before ever seeing actual games played.
MD - had 188 total yards vs SFA and one gifted point-blank range offensive TD. That's least amount yards SFA has given up all year. That includes game vs West Utah and ESL.
The Truth be told up to this point the best team MD has played is SFA who has been beat 4 other times. Don't give me that shit about CC Ca - this not great team this year. Down 42-7 early 3rd vs this years version of BG. Sure BG has solid team but not special - I believe MC proved that. Oh MC is said to be elite this year. If that's the case so is MNW and other non ranked teams they played. Then you watch some of their games. I can go on and on about this - SJB, STA, IMG - None of these teams are playing at the level we have seen in the past.
Nearly every single team above DV has shown issues this season and it's mostly the most recruited up privates.
I am telling you - these teams that are relying on transfers year in year out are also going to have up and down teams. MD is always going to be good. However, it is not automatic that schools like MD, SFA, SJB, STA, IMG, BG are going to replace elite studs with equal elite studs every year. Then to act as if Texas will never produce team that is better than the DV teams that played IMG and MD is just stupid. Hell everybody forgets that besides NS - Austin Westlake was better than both NS and DV the year DV played MD.