Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Texasball said:

Quit talking out of your ass.

The option exists for Texas powerhouses to schedule these teams. Although if past outcomes are relevant, said outcomes may explain the reticence on behalf of Texas coaches to make or take the call. Or sign the dotted line. 

Posted

Anybody that has actually watched football this season knows SFA is better than IMG. This was not an upset. Last season SFA was down, but they have played much better this season. IMG is highly overrated, as they were last season This is not 2018. 
Who cares if Cali and Texas don’t play IMG (for different reasons…. Cali can’t and Texas won’t). IMG would be a 4th place team in the Trinity League and the 5th or 6th best team in Texas.
 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JCGIII said:

That was not an upset. MaxPreps is getting lazier by the year.

Eight of the nine national pollsters had IMG ranked higher than SFA. We all can’t be wrong. SFA is peaking at the right time, especially on D. Currently, there are less than eight teams in America that would beat IMG next week. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, Bodysurf said:

Anybody that has actually watched football this season knows SFA is better than IMG. This was not an upset. Last season SFA was down, but they have played much better this season. IMG is highly overrated, as they were last season This is not 2018. 
Who cares if Cali and Texas don’t play IMG (for different reasons…. Cali can’t and Texas won’t). IMG would be a 4th place team in the Trinity League and the 5th or 6th best team in Texas.
 

MD is the only TL team that would be IMG. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Eight of the nine national pollsters had IMG ranked higher than SFA. We all can’t be wrong. SFA is peaking at the right time, especially on D. Currently, there are less than eight teams in America that would beat IMG next week. 

SFA was underrated. As for IMG, about next week,  your are probably right. The week after? From my optics the  2024 Ascenders don't appear to play team ball as well as previous editions. IMG takes plays off and is not as consistent over 48 minutes. 

Edited by JCGIII
Posted
26 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Outside of MD, is there a hotter team in America right now than SFA? Over the last four games the Panthers have outscored their opponents 150-26. Holding IMG to just three points proves just how elite their D is. 

No.

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Outside of MD, is there a hotter team in America right now than SFA? 

Mission Viejo

 

28 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

MD is the only TL team that would be IMG. 

You love Daisy chains. OLu beat your beloved SFA, but you don’t think OLu would beat IMG. Same for Bosco. Whatever?

I really don’t understand the infatuation with IMG. I’ve watched them play and I’m not impressed. And I’m being objective here.

Posted
3 hours ago, Bodysurf said:

Mission Viejo

 

You love Daisy chains. OLu beat your beloved SFA, but you don’t think OLu would beat IMG. Same for Bosco. Whatever?

I really don’t understand the infatuation with IMG. I’ve watched them play and I’m not impressed. And I’m being objective here.

He needs IMG to be ranked in order to pull in the east coast fraud teams into his Top 25.   Having IMG ranked also provides cover for under  ranking Calif teams on the basis of "they are scared to play IMG".  

Bergen Catholic is a perfect example.   BC best win is 24-20 over #65 Don Bosco.

BC lost to IMG which lost to a Utah team, and also lost to SFA who was beaten by 3rd place in the TL OLU.

But somehow he cant find 25 teams better than BC.   I could find about 50 and back it up with data points.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 hours ago, JCGIII said:

The option exists for Texas powerhouses to schedule these teams. Although if past outcomes are relevant, said outcomes may explain the reticence on behalf of Texas coaches to make or take the call. Or sign the dotted line. 

Didn’t we play SFA and Creekside lol two teams that can recently be found on MD schedule.

just being honest with you.  MD looks to have another great team this year.  You guys should be good.  The team is recruited up to the max with players from far & wide.  Honestly, I would have to have perfect storm team as a public school to ever considering playing you guys.  Truthfully, you guys should challenge yourself more!  

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Sammy Swordsman said:

He needs IMG to be ranked in order to pull in the east coast fraud teams into his Top 25.   Having IMG ranked also provides cover for under  ranking Calif teams on the basis of "they are scared to play IMG".  

Bergen Catholic is a perfect example.   BC best win is 24-20 over #65 Don Bosco.

BC lost to IMG which lost to a Utah team, and also lost to SFA who was beaten by 3rd place in the TL OLU.

But somehow he cant find 25 teams better than BC.   I could find about 50 and back it up with data points.

This is exactly what I have been saying.  You can’t reason with this guy.  
 

This is more proof that all these polls are bogus!!!!

I have been trying to tell all you dudes that this IMG team was nothing special.  They lack difference makers on both sides of the ball - The fastest way to gain couple of stars ️ is to go play for IMG.  
 

SFA is the sloppiest team in America with penalties and bone head plays and IMG had nothing to take advantage!

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

MD is the only TL team that would be IMG. 

Dude, stop that bullshit!  Did you watch the play in this game at all?

this is the least talented IMG team that I can remember!  
 

Many players have inflated star ️ rankings due to playing at IMG.

reminder DV playing in only 2nd game had just over 400 yards offense vs SFA who was already at mid season on the schedule 

Posted
4 hours ago, Bodysurf said:

Mission Viejo

 

You love Daisy chains. OLu beat your beloved SFA, but you don’t think OLu would beat IMG. Same for Bosco. Whatever?

I really don’t understand the infatuation with IMG. I’ve watched them play and I’m not impressed. And I’m being objective here.

OLu could absolutely beat IMG. And that'll be reflected in our rankings next week. SOS and Head to Head will always matter in our poll. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Texasball said:

Dude, stop that bullshit!  Did you watch the play in this game at all?

this is the least talented IMG team that I can remember!  
 

Many players have inflated star ️ rankings due to playing at IMG.

reminder DV playing in only 2nd game had just over 400 yards offense vs SFA who was already at mid season on the schedule 

When DV beats an elite, OOS team on the road, I'll listen. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

When DV beats an elite, OOS team on the road, I'll listen. 

No need to travel across the country when fake HS football teams need games and are willing to travel.  

Posted
30 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

When DV beats an elite, OOS team on the road, I'll listen. 

SFA is highly recruited up and they are forced to travel if they want competitive schedule.

You guys are so fake…pretending these teams don’t have serious advantages.  They are getting high amount of elite talent from large area’s.  End of story!

All the over recruited privates should travel and in fact they should all load up against each other.

i would only schedule the likes of MD, SJB, BG, SFA, IMG maybe couple of those fl recruited privates if my public school team was loaded with top notch QB to boot! 
 

I don’t consider any in New Jersey worthy of the above consideration.

Posted
1 hour ago, GardenStateBaller said:

No Natty then. It's quite simple. 

Bogus polls think like this.  This very thought process is why your poll like many others is bogus!

The fact that all the bogus polls couldn’t see that IMG is lacking difference makers on both sides of the ball is head scratching.   You bogus types just assumed that they have a bunch of impactful players!  They don’t! 
 

I tried to tell you.  Truly loaded IMG doesn’t lose in Utah.  They don’t have close type games nearly every week against standard HS teams.

You people are so fake/bogus that you start ranking their opponents too.  It’s comical.  

 


 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Texasball said:

Bogus polls think like this.  This very thought process is why your poll like many others is bogus!

The fact that all the bogus polls couldn’t see that IMG is lacking difference makers on both sides of the ball is head scratching.   You bogus types just assumed that they have a bunch of impactful players!  They don’t! 
 

I tried to tell you.  Truly loaded IMG doesn’t lose in Utah.  They don’t have close type games nearly every week against standard HS teams.

You people are so fake/bogus that you start ranking their opponents too.  It’s comical.  

 


 

 

Says the dude from the two-team state! 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Texasball said:

SFA is highly recruited up and they are forced to travel if they want competitive schedule.

You guys are so fake…pretending these teams don’t have serious advantages.  They are getting high amount of elite talent from large area’s.  End of story!

All the over recruited privates should travel and in fact they should all load up against each other.

i would only schedule the likes of MD, SJB, BG, SFA, IMG maybe couple of those fl recruited privates if my public school team was loaded with top notch QB to boot! 
 

I don’t consider any in New Jersey worthy of the above consideration.

Many disagree with you! 

20241029_224043.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...